#islamic indoctrination

[religion-is-a-mental-illness]

I wrote: my father's wishes to be martyred. I wish my brother who is not born yet to be martyred when he grows up.

Sweet you.

Every year visit Karbala.

Your brother isn't born yet and you wish him to be martyred?

No, when he grows up.

When he grows up.

No, I was just kidding. Great job raising her, because it isn't easy.

Thank you.

So you want your father to be martyred?

Yes.

Father and brother to be martyred?

Yeah.

You also wish to be martyred?

Yes.

Great job, truly.

==

This is what we're dealing with. They're not like us. They don't value their own lives or even their children's. They want to die murdering as many kufr, and particularly Jews, as possible.

If you're shocked by this, I really don't know why. This is all over Gaza, and ex-Muslims have been talking about it for years.

This is why I keep saying that Islam isn't "just like every religion." Xians want to die and go to heaven, but they're looking to live long enough to see the Rapture, and they're not looking to take out as many non-Xians as possible in the process.

Believe them when they tell you what they're up to.

[secular-jew]

When children are educated to be like this, there's a reason they will FAFO and never have any peace.

[angelic-shadow]

I see where people are coming from when they say "they won't teach about x subject yet they'll reach religion?" or "they shouldn't be talking about religion in schools" but it still kinda misses the point. The problem isn't that they're teaching about religion in schools at all. the issue is that they only teach about one religion (Christianity) and they talk about it as if it's the only religion or the only good religion, and depending on which school you go to they may force those who aren't Christian to partake in Christian activities. The solution isn't to stop talking about religion in schools. The solution is to talk about all religions, to talk about athiesm and agnosticism, to talk about religious trauma, to talk about the history of religion, to talk about cults, to talk about bigotry that some religious groups (especially jews and muslims) face and to give *all* religious people a choice to practice.

I don't want schools to stop teaching about religion. I want schools to stop telling kids that there's only one religion to follow, I want schools to teach about all religions, all beliefs, and to allow non-christians to have to freedom to practice their own and to not force them to partake in christian practices.

[megmelodia]

There is a weird tie between Christianity and the military in the US, also. Somehow the state and church have convinced conservative Christians that joining the military is a godly activity.

I was raised in a very religious, very military town. Luckily, my mom is an atheist and my brother and I never even considered enlisting.

Idk but as an Arab Muslim growing up in the states I never felt "indoctrinated" to want to join the army or ever think of the army as a positive thing

[tooclosetothestaars]

My two cents on "modesty" 🌚

Modest

1. unassuming or moderate in the estimation of one's abilities or achievements.

2. (of an amount, rate, or level) relatively moderate, limited, or small.

3. dressing or behaving so as to avoid impropriety or indecency, especially to avoid attracting sexual attention (typically used of a woman).

Hmm... see any connections here?

"Modesty" in itself objectifies and sexualizes women. There shouldn't be such a concept. I repeat, "modesty" in itself objectifies and sexualizes women. And, the word "modest" means "humble", while the word "immodest" means not humble. Obviously, there is a connection here. You'll often see that there is similarity or a connection between the multiple meanings of a certain word. There is perhaps a reason why that one specific word is used in multiple different ways: it's because there is a similarity or a connection between the different meanings. The opposite of the word modest is immodest. And we all know that often when prefixes start with "im" or "in" (or "un"), it means that it's the opposite of a word and it has a negative connotation. Examples: improper, immature, impossible, impatient, imperfect, immoral, impolite, imbalance, inappropriate, inability, inaccuracy, incomplete, incompatible, etc. The word "immodest" when referring to how you dress, clearly has a strong negative connotation. What I'm saying is "modest" = good, and "immodest" = bad. Dressing "modestly" = self-respect, dressing "immodestly" = no self-respect. Dressing "modestly" = humble, dressing "immodestly" = not humble. This is bullshit and just wrong.

The word "modest" means humble. Being humble is considered something good. The word "modest" also refers to a way of dressing. That is also considered something good. Something better, something humble. Dressing "modestly" is considered a particularly good thing, and that is a problem itself. It's considered good, better, decent, and "mature", etc. Covering yourself and not intentionally accentuating your figure can be a preference for some women, but it shouldn't be considered particularly good or better, because that implies that NOT dressing "modestly" is bad, worse, improper, "indecent", or immature, when it's not. That is a problem. Women, for years and years, have been and STILL ARE criticized, shamed, attacked, judged, disparaged, ostracized, frowned upon, called slurs ("slut", "whore") and even killed and punished (looking at you especially, Afghanistan and Iran) for dressing in a "revealing manner" or for dressing "immodestly". When a girl or a woman gets raped, sexually harassed or assaulted, people even blame it on her having dressed "immodestly" or not "modestly". That is sick. This clearly shows that not dressing "modestly" is considered worse, bad, or immature, etc. So in addition, people who say "modesty" is a choice are saying some nonsense because the opposite of what they say is a choice is literally considered something bad (ie 'immodesty').

This fact itself just reveals one of the biggest issues with Islam, obviously, because Islam strongly promotes "modesty", especially for women, and there's a lot about all this in the Quran and the Hadith, of course. This is one of the main things in Islam, and it is just another huge problem with it. All this and what I'm about to say next just shows that one of the key "values" in Hislam (no, that's not a typo), is ridiculous and makes Islam stand out more as something just really, really bad ¯⁠\⁠_⁠(⁠ ͡⁠°⁠ ͜⁠ʖ⁠ ͡⁠°⁠)⁠_⁠/⁠¯ And yes, other religions also promote "modesty". Islam is in the top 2 of the most followed religions in the world.

"Modesty" is a concept that is almost always applied to WOMEN/GIRLS and this is connected to so many other things, I could just go on and on and on. Like I said, dressing modestly is apparently "humble". Women have to be humble, women have to be quiet, women have to be submissive, women have to be polite, women can't be too confident, women can't show off, women can't brag, women can't boast, women can't talk about their accomplishments or achievements and should remain humble (ie being modest, why is the word "modesty" also associated with how you dress?), women shouldn't "show" "too much" skin, women shouldn't "show" their figure, women shouldn't reveal themselves, women should be small, hidden, women shouldn't be "too much", and dressing revealingly is "too much", women can't take up too much space, women can't sit with their legs apart because it's "inappropriate" and they can't take up space, of course, women shouldn't attract the attention of men and it is their responsibility to make sure men aren't sexually attracted to them, and women should hide their beauty (= ISLAM), etc etc etc. A woman should keep herself confined. Women and girls are taught all these things, directly and indirectly. Men and guys are allowed to do/be or not do/be these things and it's more accepted. Do you see what I'm talking about? See the connections?

This is just another one of the many and the biggest ways society wants and tries to restrict women/girls, take away their freedom, take away their right to express themselves, take away their right to take up space, take away their freedom to be authentic, take away their bodily autonomy, take away their power, etc. And it's all existed for far too long. The concept of "modesty" (and "immodesty") when referring to a way of dressing, shouldn't exist.

[johnlatter]

Pro-Hamas Turkish MP warns Israel of Allah's wrath then dies.

Hasan Bitmez had a heart attack in Turkey's Parliament building on the 12th of December, 2023.

As a tongue-in-cheek comment, and as the attached image suggests, perhaps Bitmez should have taken Yahweh's wrath into account before uttering such a threat!

Was it really divine retribution? 

No, just someone else who confused an internal childhood trauma* with any external real gods there may be.

An article in The Times of Israel reported that Bitmez, a 54-year-old member of the Islamist Saadet Partisi, or Felicity Party, collapsed after a speech criticizing President Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s AK Party (Justice and Development Party) at the end of which he said Israel would suffer Allan's wrath.

Two days later, on the 14th of December, Al-Jazeera reported that Hasan had died in an Ankara hospital.

Image accessibility

An AI Art artificial intelligence image showing a biblical god (Yahweh) sending a bolt of lightning into a large middle-eastern building, somewhat akin to a palace. The building represents Turkey's Parliament where Hasan Bitmez, a 54-year-old member of the Islamist Saadet Partisi, or Felicity Party, collapsed with a heart attack on the 12th of December 2023. The image suggests that Yahweh's wrath is just as potent as that of Allah.

Notes

*Specifically, the archeotrauma (alt. archaeotrauma), the psychological wound human beings, horses, and other animals sustain when their spirit is "broken".

Also see Evolution and Psychology Research (just a bare-bones holding page at the time of writing, but one that outlines unconventional areas of interest).

The psychology of terrorism.

[immaculatasknight]

Hands off our kids

[evillesbianvillain]

*Children of a culture that has indoctrinated them through decades of viruelent islamophobia directed at dehumanizing the people they have systematically killed for the past 30 years* but my criticism of the concept of martyrdom in islam is actually really rational

[religion-is-a-mental-illness]

Aya: My name is Aya Ahmed Abdullah Sa'id al-Banna. I study at [UNRWA's] Tulkarm Camp Girls' School.

Interviewer: Did you learn anything in school about the Right of Return?

Aya: Yes. The right of the brave, and we'll return to our land, stuff like that.

Interviewer: What do they teach you about Israel?

Aya: That we'll... That we'll shoot them

Interviewer: Do you hate the Jews?

Aya: Yes, a lot.

Interviewer: Why?

Aya: Because they're our enemies and we'll take back our right from them.

Interviewer: What do you think about the attack on Israel on October 7th and the war that happened after it? Is this connected to the Right of Return?

Aya: Yes. So that we can take Palestine, and so that our land returns to us.

Interviewer: Do you think Al-Aqsa is just symbolic?

Aya: No, I'm willing to fight for it.

Interviewer: Is there room for the Jews in Al-Aqsa?

Aya: No.

Interviewer: Do the Jews have the right to exist here in Palestine?

Aya: No. Because Palestine is ours, not theirs.

Interviewer: Is it possible to divide Palestine between the Jews and the Palestinians?

Aya: No. This is our land.

Interviewer: What do you like to watch the most on your phone?

Aya: I like to watch things about Palestine, the martyrs, the resistance fighters and Hamas.

Interviewer: So, would you want to join the resistance?

Aya: Yes.

Interviewer: Why?

Aya: So that I can fight, and take my rights from Israel and become a martyr.

Interviewer: What do you learn in school about peace?

Aya: It teaches me... that we don't like Israel.

Interviewer: Are the martyrs heroes?

Aya: Yes, they're big heroes.

Interviewer: Do you want to become a martyr?

Aya: Yes.

Interviewer: Why?

Aya: So that we can rise up to Allah.

==

UNRWA is just a front for Hamas.

Reminder that Al-Aqsa resides on the Temple Mount, and the existence of both the First and Second Temples at that location is well-established. Yes, the bible is fictional, but so is Spider-Man and we don't have to assume that New York is fictional too, because fiction can be set in real locations. And we don't have to blindly trust the fables of the bible when there is archaeological evidence.

No matter how much bogus postmodern academic gibberish Hamas supporters throw around, this is about Islamic hate for Jews. And always was.

"You should attack every Jew possible in all the world and kill them." -- Fathi Hamad, Hamas Interior Minister

"People of Jerusalem. We want you to cut off the heads of the Jews with knives. With your hand, cut their artery from here. A knife costs five shekels. Buy a knife, sharpen it, put it there, and just cut off [their heads]. It costs just five shekels." -- Fathi Hamad, Hamas Interior Minister

"... the Islamic Resistance Movement aspires to the realisation of Allah's promise, no matter how long that should take. The Prophet, Allah bless him and grant him salvation, has said: 'The Day of Judgement will not come about until Moslems fight the Jews (killing the Jews), when the Jew will hide behind stones and trees. The stones and trees will say O Moslems, O Abdulla, there is a Jew behind me, come and kill him.'" -- Hamas Charter, 1988

[secular-jew]

With kids like these....

[mariacallous]

Salman Rushdie has just published Knife: Meditations After an Attempted Murder. In August 2022, he was giving a talk at the Chautauqua Institution in New York. Hadi Matar, a 24-year-old from New Jersey, rushed the stage and stabbed him 15 times. It was astonishing that Salman survived. He lost the sight in one eye and sustained terrible injuries, but he’s still with us and he’s still writing, and unlike Hadi Matar, he’s still worth hearing.

We think of fanatics as stalkers with an obsessive knowledge of their targets.  Like the antisemites who compile lists of Jews in the media or the homophobes who so focus on the details of gay sex they might almost be closet cases

Most terrorists and bigots are not like that. They are like soldiers in an army who kill and hate for no other reason than tradition or men in authority have told them to kill and hate. If we were less fascinated by the pseudo-glamour of violence, we would see them for what they are: dullards and jerks.

In Knife Salman is almost as angered by the sheer lazy stupidity of his wannabee assassin as his violence.

“I do not want to use his name in this account. My Assailant, my would-be Assassin, the Asinine man who made Assumptions about me, and with whom I had a near-lethal Assignation … I have found myself thinking of him, perhaps forgivably, as an Ass.”

The ass “didn’t bother to inform himself about the man he decided to kill. By his own admission he read barely two pages of my writing and watched a couple of YouTube videos”.

That was enough, apparently, along with a little light indoctrination in the Levant.

We know from Matar’s mother that her son changed from a popular young man to a moody religious zealot after visiting her ex-husband in the Hezbollah-controlled town of Yaroun in Lebanon, a mile or so from the Israeli border.

“I was expecting him to come back motivated, to complete school, to get his degree and a job. But instead, he locked himself in the basement. He had changed a lot. He didn't say anything to me or his sisters for months.”

Salman quotes a wonderfully perceptive line from Jodi Picoult

“If you meet a loner, no matter what they tell you, it’s not because they enjoy solitude. It’s because they have tried to blend into the world before, and people continue to disappoint them.”

Rushdie is openly contemptuous, as he has every right to be.

“I see you now at twenty-four,” he writes, “already disappointed by life, disappointed in your mother, your sisters, your father, your lack of boxing talent, your lack of any talent at all; disappointed in the bleak future you saw stretching ahead of you, for which you refused to blame yourself.”

This has always been the way. Readers old enough to remember 1989 when the Ayatollah Khomeini ordered Salman’s execution for writing a blasphemous satire of Islam’s origin story in the Satanic Verses,will know that Khomeini had not read it. Nor had the furious demonstrators in the streets or the regressive leftists and Tory ministers who upbraided him for the non-crime of causing offence.

Those of us who had read the book pointed out that it was a magical realist fiction which contained sympathetic accounts of the racism Muslim immigrants in the UK suffered. Indeed, the Tories of the day loathed Salman, we continued, because of his confrontations with official racism.

But after a while we fell silent. Pleading with his enemies felt demeaning. It gave them undeserved credit, as if they were reasonable people, who could be swayed by evidence rather than just, well, pillocks.

In Knife Salman attempts an imaginary conversation with his persecutor.

OK, he says, Islam, unlike Judaism and Christianity, holds that man is not made in God’s image. God has no human qualities, it says.

But isn’t language a human quality? To have language, God would have to have a mouth, a tongue, vocal cords and a voice, just like a man. The terrorist’s understanding is that God cannot be like a man, however. So, God could not have spoken to Gabriel in Arabic. Gabriel must have translated his message when he came to the prophet.

The angel made it comprehensible to Muhammed by delivering it in human speech which is not the speech of God.

Thus, the version of Islamic instruction Matar received in his basement when he switched from playing video games to listening to Imams was an interpretation of a translation.

“I’m trying to suggest to you that, even according to your own tradition, there is uncertainty. Some of your own early philosophers have suggested this. They say everything can be interpreted, even the Book. It can be interpreted according to the times in which the interpreter lives. Literalism is a mistake.”

For a while, Rushdie says he wants to meet Matar again at the trial, as if he wants to have the argument in the flesh.

He tells a story about Samuel Beckett, which could only have happened to Samuel Beckett.

Beckett was walking through Paris in 1938 when he was confronted by a pimp named Prudent, who wanted money from him. Beckett pushed Prudent away, whereupon the pimp pulled out a knife and stabbed him in the chest, narrowly missing the left lung and the heart.

Beckett was taken to the nearest hospital, bleeding heavily. He only just survived.

You will never guess who paid for his treatment. James Joyce, of course, he did.

Anyway, Beckett went to the pimp’s trial. He met Prudent in the courtroom, and asked him why he had done it. This was the pimp’s reply: “Je ne sais pas, monsieur. Je m’excuse.” (I don’t know, sir. I’m sorry.)

But the more he thought about it, the less Rushdie had to say to his enemy. The idea that you can have theological arguments with a man who wants to kill you for writing a book he hasn’t even read felt ridiculous.

Although popular culture is full of stories about murderers, and true crime podcasts top the charts, killers and fanatics are nearly always less interesting than their victims. More often than not they are just thick. Nasty and vicious, but thick first of all.

We are about to see the stupidity of fanatics deployed on a mass scale. Two thirds of Republican voters (and nearly 3 in 10 Americans) continue to believe that the 2020 election was stolen from Donald Trump, and that Joe Biden was not lawfully elected. They think it because that is what Trump told them to think.

Islamists told Matar that Salman was an apostate, and that was all he needed to know. Trump told Republicans the election was stolen and ditto.

If Republicans were consistent people, they would not vote for Trump in 2024. What would be the point? They would have every reason to fear that the deep state would rig the 2024 presidential election as it rigged the 2020 presidential election.

But they will vote for him because, once again, that is what he tells them to do.

In the end there is a limit to how much attention you can pay the vicious and the stupid.

They are not interesting enough, as Rushdie concluded with marvellous disdain as he contemplated the life sentence Matar will face.

"Here we stand: the man who failed to kill an unarmed seventy-five-year-old writer, and the now 76-year-old writer. Somewhat to my surprise, I find I have very little to say to you. Our lives touched each other for an instant and then separated. Mine has improved since that day, while yours has deteriorated. You made a bad gamble and lost. I was the one with the luck… Perhaps, in the incarcerated decades that stretch out before you, you will learn introspection, and come to understand that you did something wrong. But you know what? I don’t care. This, I think, is what I have come to this courtroom to say to you. I don’t care about you, or the ideology that you claim to represent, and which you represent so poorly. I have my life, and my work, and there are people who love me. I care about those things.”

[antiling-but-simic]

If you are against religion, you can't just be against Christianity. If you hate religion as a concept and as a practice, that means you have to hate *all* religion, including the marginalized ones. If you're antithiest, you're not just antichristian. Your Anti Islam, Anti Judaism, you have to be against all religions, even "the good kind."

I am against *all* religion because it is a harmful practice that indoctrinates people into stupidity and blissful ignorance. There is no such thing as a Christian Scientist. There is no such thing as a Muslim Feminist. There is no such thing as a good religion. The sooner we realize that, the better.

With that being said, I'm not gonna harass religious people. Just know that I am against your beliefs. If that's enough for you to block me, so be it.

[gaia-aviva]

It doesn't show anyone else's faces, but you can see that the hands that are stuffing explosive powder into IEDs are not those of full grown adults. 

Jenin's bomb-makers are children.

Ali's mother continues: “Before Ali left the house, he carried a sack full of explosive devices on his shoulder, and later he planted them in the streets and alleys of Jenin camp with the help of his friends, who confirmed that Ali participated with them in a confrontation with the occupation from zero distance."

Palestinian terror groups recruit children to build bombs.

They encourage kids to turn their homes into bomb depots.

They instruct children to plant these bombs in the roads of Jenin where they can kill not only the children but anyone who happens to come by.

And they freely and proudly admit this.

This is not just child abuse: this is systemic and widespread child abuse that is a source of pride to Palestinians.

Now listen to the silence from UNICEF, the UN Human Rights Council, Defense for Children-International, Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International.  

PCHR reported on July 3 that Israeli forces shot Ali Hani Al-Ghoul in the chest, killing him. It admitted that he was a member of an armed group and said he was 20 years old.

Later, the Israel/Palestine Timeline site said that al-Ghoul was shot in the head, and that he was 17 years old.

His mother was interviewed:

His mother brought back some of her memories with her little Ali, which she will never forget; She says, "About two years ago, Ali used to come home at night, with his clothes dusty and his eyes red, and he was suffering from severe pain, which was caused by the explosive materials he was using." "Ali was one of the resistance fighters who made explosive devices in the Jenin camp from primitive materials, but their impact was great and effective by damaging many Israeli military vehicles," according to his mother, who expressed her pride in what her son did and what his friends say about his actions that are beyond his age.

That means that Ali al-Ghoul had been building bombs since he was 15 years old.

Now, the Jenin Brigades division of Islamic Jihad have issued a video celebrating Al-Ghoul's "martyrdom" - showing him building IEDs together with other children. 

[jewish-vents]

As a proud Jew and a member of the Iŋalit Iñupiaq people I have never felt as seen as reading a Choctaw Jew's post on here. Christian missionaries hauled my people off of our lands and killed most of us and they didn't even inhabit the land. They didn't even build shit there, they just took it to take it, and I'm supposed to go "ah yes America has no colonizers" and not laugh when these people say "Hebrew is a colonizer language"? Motherfuckers, MY LANGUAGE IS EXTINCT BECAUSE OF YOU! You know who didn't ever try and force a language on anyone? The Ashke Jewish man my great-great grandmother fell for and married. People really expect me to be onboard with their fact-free zero colonialism rewrite of history while my people's lands remain off limits to us, illegal to even visit, the US government holding onto it on the off chance there might be oil there even though they never bothered to even drill for it in over 70 years.

"No other religion acts like this" first of all please read up on Islamic imperialism and get your boot off the neck of my indigenous Middle Eastern brethren and secondly Christian-governed Alaska wouldn't let Native students attend school with "American" children - that is literally how the law phrased it - unless we abandoned our language, our clothes, our songs, our stories, our religion and even traditions as basic as sharing food with poor families in the community. You wanna know how my great-great grandmother met my great-great grandfather? They were both arrested for violating the law and "indoctrinating" children into "Native, anti-European practices" by which I mean THEY WERE BOTH ARRESTED FOR GIVING FOOD TO POOR PEOPLE. They were both arrested by CHRISTIANS!

And people mistake my brown skin for proof of goy status and want to talk shit about how the only good colonizer is a dead colonizer. You're white and you're in ALASKA, you might want to rethink the words coming out of your mouth when most of your ancestors came here to mine gold and get rich and mistreat indigenous people. Even if I accepted the idea that Israel is doing colonialism, which I do not, nobody moved to Israel to get rich and rape indigenous women with impunity to the point where there are words in Inuit languages for gangrape done by white men.

I don't want to hear another thing from a white goy in Alaska about Israel being colonizers when the US bought Alaska from Russia. We were colonized twice for you to get to be here and tell me to my face how colonizers are bad. AND THEN people want to say my Ashke ancestors were colonizers. Fleeing Russia is not colonization, one, and two, WHY DO YOU THINK THEY LEFT?! For fun? What, they heard our weather was nice and wanted to come visit?

I am going to need white goyim to learn US history before they open their mouths.

I'm sorry this is long and I yelled/capslocked but I have had to bite my tongue so many times to not cause a scene because I don't want the university to come up with an excuse not to let me graduate due to poor conduct. It is so tiring. I feel like I'm holding my breath all the time. Graduation is tomorrow. Shabbat shalom.

.

[johnlatter]

USA is Great Satan? Israel Little Satan? Meet the Real Satan!

Using such derogatory labels is simply the projection of a Real Satan, someone who believes in an internal psychological god rather than an external supernatural one. 

At the nation-state level, a Real Satan is exemplified by Iran.

Break a child like a horse (the archeotrauma*), subject it to years of religious indoctrination that traps layers of repression behind the resultant psychological wound, and the whole can be compacted and corrupted, ready to erupt into unnatural violence whenever triggered by  pre-programmed keywords ("Jew") and concepts ("Immodesty").

A veritable internal god of violence, complete with a halo of righteousness, that is capable of any kind of atrocity.

Nothing to do with any real god at all, but everything to do with the control of populations whose members are each internally bound by the psychological chains of their childhood brainwashing.

Great Satan

The "Great Satan" (Persian: شيطان بزرگ Shaytân-e Bozorg) is a derogatory epithet used in some Muslim-majority countries to refer to the United States. Alongside the "Death to America" slogan, it originated in Iran during the Islamic Revolution. While it is primarily an expression of anti-American sentiment, it has occasionally been used to refer to the United Kingdom, although the term "old fox" is more popular as a dedicated expression of anti-British sentiment. The epithet was coined by Iranian religious leader Ruhollah Khomeini, who used it in a speech on 5 November 1979,

Little Satan

"Little Satan" (Persian: شیطان کوچک, Shaytân-e Kuchak; Arabic: الشيطان الأصغر, Hebrew: השטן הקטן) is an anti-Israeli derogatory epithet used especially by Iranian leaders for Israel.

According to some sources Ruhollah Khomeini, leader of Iranian Revolution, first used the term in its contemporary meaning. Israel was condemned as the "Little Satan" in 1979 by Khomeini when he was addressing Israel's backing of the Shah, its close ties to the US, and the ongoing Israeli–Palestinian conflict.

Image accessibility

An AI (artificial intelligence) Art depiction of an Hamas terrorist with the face of a demon posing on bended knee, 

There's a Palestine flag on his shirt and In his right hand is a sharp knife. Behind is an Iranian flag, set against a blue sky with occasional white clouds.

Notes

*The archeotrauma (alt. archaeotrauma) is the psychological wound human beings, horses, and other animals sustain when their spirit is "broken". Also see Evolution and Psychology Research (just a bare-bones holding page at the time of writing, but one that outlines unconventional areas of interest).

The psychology of terrorism.